FACTS

    The CEOs of Facebook, Amazon, Google, and Apple were grilled Wednesday by the House Antitrust Subcommittee regarding “how large tech platforms abuse their position to invade user privacy, muscle out or buy up competitors, and gouge suppliers and partners.” Both sides have beef with the major tech companies, but for differing reasons. A Reason article reported that “it quickly became apparent” from both sides of the aisle “that the real purpose of the hearing was political power.”

    LEFT

    The Left supports government antitrust legislation. It is argued that Big Tech has become too big and powerful, effectively controlling the market and squashing any competition with their unfair practices.

    “It is one thing to possess a monopoly and quite another to cause harm based off of the market power afforded through that monopoly position.”

    Dipayan Ghosh, Pozen Fellow at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy

    Ghosh argued that despite the fact that it may not be blatantly obvious, these companies do harm consumers in a myriad of ways. Others agree that it is an issue Congress should further investigate. David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, argued that our problem is not only with Big Tech, but rather that the whole “structure of modern capitalism favors companies that operate at once-unimaginable scale, in the absence of a government will to prevent monopolies from forming.”

    RIGHT

    The Right, while leery of the tech companies’ power, argues that the free market, not government intervention, is the best “cure” for monopolies.

    “Everyone seems to hate America’s giant tech companies these days—except the hundreds of millions of people who use their products…”

    The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board

    Conservative lawmakers railed on the CEOs, with Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) arguing that “while big is not inherently bad,” the companies have abused their power by, among other things, censoring conservative viewpoints. A Washington Examiner article criticized the hearing for failing to really dig into what “should have been the real question of the day” – the companies’ links to the Chinese Communist Party and their use of slave labor.

    • Show Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    Protestor Who Shot Portland Man Killed by Police

    FACTS The man responsible for the death of Aaron J. Danielson in Portland last ...

    California to Require “Unisex” Kids Sections?

    FACTS Lawmakers in California have proposed a new piece of legislation, AB-2826, which aims ...

    Biden’s Ms. Vice President

    FACTS Speculation and anticipation ensue over who Joe Biden’s running mate will be in ...

    Democratic National Convention

    FACTS In a virtual, 2020-style affair, Democrats kicked off their national convention on Monday, ...

    China Opens Law Enforcement Office in Hong Kong

    FACTS After announcing new sweeping security legislation in June, China has officially opened its ...

    Iran Oil Tanker Attack

    Attack of Oil Tanker Two international oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz were allegedly ...

    GET LUCIDFIND TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK - ONCE A WEEK