FACTS

    On Wednesday, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss the case against Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Sullivan was seeking to reexamine the Justice Department’s (DOJ) March decision to drop charges against Flynn, who was accused of illegal involvement with Russia.

    LEFT

    The Left – who believes Flynn is guilty of collusion with Russia and points out that he confessed his involvement – thinks the decision fails to uphold justice. It is believed that Attorney General William Barr is “too quick to side with the president” and it was written of Judge Neomi Rao, who decided the case, that the “most brazenly partisan judicial appointee has come through for the president once again.” Federal defense Attorney Nick Oberheiden wrote that the Court’s decision will set a dangerous precedence and “jeopardize other cases and investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 elections.”

    “But in this case, there is substantial reason to question the government’s conduct… the decision to drop the Flynn case is not simply business as usual. It reeks of political manipulation at the highest levels of the United States government.

    Editorial board, Washington Post

    RIGHT

    The Right, who agrees with the DOJ that Flynn did nothing wrong and was bullied into “confessing,” thinks the decision upholds justice. The Wall Street Journal editorial board wrote that the appeals court judges “deserve credit for a courageous decision that restrains a lower court when it exceeds its constitutional authority,” noting that Judge Sullivan went out of his jurisdiction by reinvestigating Flynn’s case.

    “The DOJ concluded that there had been no basis for the FBI to investigate Flynn, and therefore that any alleged misstatement he’d made in a January 24, 2017, interview could not have been material to a legitimate government investigation, as the false-statements statute requires.”

    Andrew C. McCarthy, contributing editor for National Review

    USA Today columnist Jonathan Turley wrote that Sullivan’s actions in the case were no threat to President Trump, but rather a threat to “the administration of justice in our court system.”

    • Show Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    Boy Scouts Ad Campaign for Sexual Abuse Victims

    FACTS The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) recently launched a new advertising campaign aimed ...

    Proposed Gun Control Legislation

    FACTS Texas Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democrat, has introduced new gun legislation which ...

    Trump Suspends Immigrant Work Visas

    FACTS An order temporarily halting many work-visa programs for immigrants and extending the April ...

    The 2020 Food Chain

    FACTS The food supply chain is dramatically changing world-wide, likely altering things indefinitely. Grocery ...

    California Closes a Second Time

    FACTS California Governor Gavin Newsom announced Monday that California would be entering back into ...

    Sexual Harassment Accusations against NFL Team

    FACTS On Thursday, The Washington Post released a report in which 15 women made ...

    GET LUCIDFIND TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK - ONCE A WEEK