FACTS

    On Wednesday, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss the case against Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Sullivan was seeking to reexamine the Justice Department’s (DOJ) March decision to drop charges against Flynn, who was accused of illegal involvement with Russia.

    LEFT

    The Left – who believes Flynn is guilty of collusion with Russia and points out that he confessed his involvement – thinks the decision fails to uphold justice. It is believed that Attorney General William Barr is “too quick to side with the president” and it was written of Judge Neomi Rao, who decided the case, that the “most brazenly partisan judicial appointee has come through for the president once again.” Federal defense Attorney Nick Oberheiden wrote that the Court’s decision will set a dangerous precedence and “jeopardize other cases and investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 elections.”

    “But in this case, there is substantial reason to question the government’s conduct… the decision to drop the Flynn case is not simply business as usual. It reeks of political manipulation at the highest levels of the United States government.

    Editorial board, Washington Post

    RIGHT

    The Right, who agrees with the DOJ that Flynn did nothing wrong and was bullied into “confessing,” thinks the decision upholds justice. The Wall Street Journal editorial board wrote that the appeals court judges “deserve credit for a courageous decision that restrains a lower court when it exceeds its constitutional authority,” noting that Judge Sullivan went out of his jurisdiction by reinvestigating Flynn’s case.

    “The DOJ concluded that there had been no basis for the FBI to investigate Flynn, and therefore that any alleged misstatement he’d made in a January 24, 2017, interview could not have been material to a legitimate government investigation, as the false-statements statute requires.”

    Andrew C. McCarthy, contributing editor for National Review

    USA Today columnist Jonathan Turley wrote that Sullivan’s actions in the case were no threat to President Trump, but rather a threat to “the administration of justice in our court system.”

    • Show Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    Faithless Voters & The Electoral College

    FACTS As the 2020 elections quickly approach, this week the Supreme Court heard two ...

    Mass Protests Against Belarus Leader Continue

    FACTS Over 200,000 people gathered in Belarus on Sunday to protest against President Alexander ...

    Biden’s $2.3 Trillion Infrastructure Proposal

    FACTS A $2.3 trillion “infrastructure” proposal by President Biden is facing pushback from Republicans ...

    Pro-Democracy Arrests Escalate in Hong Kong

    FACTS Arrests in Hong Kong continue, with 11 people taken into custody Thursday for ...

    New York Times Opinion Editor Resigns

    FACTS After publishing a controversial opinion piece, The New York Times announced that their ...

    LONDON BRIDGE ATTACK

    Facts On Friday, November 29th, a man armed with a knife and wearing what ...

    GET LUCIDFIND TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK - ONCE A WEEK