FACTS

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blocked an immediate vote on a bill by the U.S. House of Representatives to increase stimulus checks to $2000 per eligible person, saying instead the Senate should “begin a process” to consider it and other measures requested by President Trump. These include investigation into election fraud and a “repeal of a tech liability shield” for companies such as Facebook and YouTube.

    LEFT

    The Left criticizes McConnell’s decision as an intentional delay and argues that his choice to “link all of Mr. Trump’s demands” into one bill is meant to sabotage the stimulus check increase. The New York TimesCatie Edmonds noted that it is highly unlikely that the Democrat-controlled House will approve Trump’s requests: “Democrats are…likely to resist anything that could be seen as trying to undermine the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.” An article from the Washington Post wrote that McConnell’s move was an “attempt to poison the bipartisan effort to deliver larger checks.” “I don’t know what he has in mind, but the House passed, to their credit, a simple, straightforward bill. Let’s not muddy the waters: Are you for $2,000 or are you not?” asked Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT), who blocked a House vote on a defense bill until McConnell agrees to separate the stimulus check measure from the other two issues.

    “Senate Democrats strongly support $2,000 checks. Even President Trump supports $2,000 checks. There’s one question left today: Do Senate Republicans join with the rest of America in supporting $2,000 checks?”

    Chuck Schumer, Senate Minority Leader

    RIGHT

    The Right is split in their opinion. Some Republican Senators, including Sen. Marco Rubio, Sen. Josh Hawley, and Sen. Kelly Loefller, supported the increase to $2000, but the vast majority of Republicans stood opposed to it. It argued by many Republicans that the move would tack an “estimated $463 billion” onto to the already astronomically high U.S. debt and that “the best way to help struggling families is to get them back to work.” Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) noted, “What we know is that much of this extra $1,400 will go to pay down credit-card debt, or savings, or make new purchases online at Walmart, Best Buy or Amazon. We can do better to help people get back to work and truly help this recovery.”

    “Let’s get this straight: The small shopkeeper who’s lost their entire savings because of the lockdowns will get the same $2,000 grant as the government bureaucrat who’s been enjoying a steady paycheck at home for the past 10 months. This money is wholly inadequate for those who have been harmed by the lockdowns and wholly unnecessary for those who have not.”

    Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA)
    • Show Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    Texas Salon Owner Jailed for Operating Her Business

    FACTS A Dallas, TX area salon owner, Shelley Luther was sentenced to seven days ...

    Athletes Bring Transgender Issue to Court

    FACTS In February, three high school girls filed a court case challenging a decision ...

    Hollywood Evolving

    FACTS The film industry – producers, actors, directors, and viewers alike – is being ...

    Passports, Other Federal IDs to Now Include “X” Gender Option?

    FACTS The U.S. government could soon implement changes which would include a new option ...

    The World Health Organization: End Lockdowns?

    FACTS Dr. David Nabarro, one of six doctors chosen as envoys for the Covid-panel ...

    TESLA Bucks California & Starts It’s Engines

    FACTS In one of the most high-profile acts of COVID-19 government-defiance yet, Tesla CEO ...

    GET LUCIDFIND TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK - ONCE A WEEK