FACTS

    A South Carolina House committee is currently reviewing the South Carolina Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act, which has already passed through the Senate with a 30-13 vote and which Governor Henry McMaster has previously said he would sign. The bill would “require testing for a detectable fetal heartbeat before an abortion is performed on a pregnant woman.” If a heartbeat is detected, which is possible as early as six weeks, a doctor would only be able to perform the abortion procedure if it is a case of rape or incest, or if the mother’s life is at risk due to the pregnancy.

    RIGHT

    The Right supports the bill. Students for Life President Kristan Hawkins called it “great news.” Sen. Larry Grooms (R-SC), a sponsor of the “Heartbeat Bill, argued “Life is the most precious right we have. Government’s primary duty is to protect the fundamental right to life. Without life, no other rights really matter.” “If this gets upheld by the courts, we will have saved thousands of lives in South Carolina every year. That is a tremendous victory,” stated Republican state Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey.

    “If we’re using the heartbeat as the scientific test for when our life ends, I think it only makes good common sense that we use it for determining when our life begins. As a mother, as a woman and as a leader in South Carolina, I think it’s important that I stand up to show my support.”

    Lt. Governor Pamela Evette

    No symbol of life is stronger than a beating heart, and the Heartbeat Bill ensures that when a baby’s heart is beating, the government will not sanction that life to be taken,” stated Danny Verdin, Chairman of the Senate Medical Affairs Committee.

    LEFT

    The Left opposes the bill. The Womens Rights and Empowerment Network, a womens’ rights group in South Carolina, tweeted, “Rhetoric is just that, rhetoric. This abortion ban is directly aimed at the most marginalized people in South Carolina. We know that any limitation on reproductive rights will NEGATIVELY impact Black and Brown womxn in this state.” Sen. Mia McLeod (D-SC) argued that the bill takes “away [womens’] rights, our liberties, our freedoms and our choices.” Former congressional candidate Jesse Mermell, a senior leader at Planned Parenthood, stated, “This would be a disaster for pregnant people in S.C., disproportionately impacting black and brown people. And would set dangerous precedent.” Ilyse Hogue, President of NARAL Pro-Choice America, called the bill “a cruel way to exert power and control over pregnant people.”

    “The bill would disproportionately impact young people, women, and people of color—and require nonconsensual transvaginal ultrasounds to detect fetal heartbeats. We must fight back.”

    Women’s March Twitter page
    • Show Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    The Homeschooling Divide

    FACTS Professor Elizabeth Bartholet of Harvard University recently called for a presumptive ban on ...

    Novel Coronavirus Comes to US

    FACTS The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is expected to announce this afternoon ...

    Criticism Over Maskless Tom Brady

    FACTS Tampa Bay Buccanneers’ quarterback Tom Brady, a seven-time Super Bowl winner, invoked the ...

    Healthcare Workers Experience Severe Reactions to Pfizer Vaccine

    FACTS At least four healthcare workers have experienced severe reactions to the Pfizer vaccine ...

    Trump Nominated for Second Nobel Peace Prize

    FACTS President Trump has received his second 2021 Nobel Peace Prize nomination within a ...

    James O’Keefe, Twitter Banned

    FACTS James O’Keefe, founder of non-profit undercover journalism organization Project Veritas, had his Twitter ...

    GET LUCIDFIND TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK - ONCE A WEEK