FACTS

    Professor Elizabeth Bartholet of Harvard University recently called for a presumptive ban on homeschooling and is helping organize a homeschool summit which will be held at Harvard in the late spring. A team of experts will be covering an array of topics including what they consider to be the dangers of homeschooling. During the summit, speakers will discuss varying measures for reform. Some propose more strict regulation and greater supervision by the state; others believe a ban, in which parents would be able to obtain exemption, but not simply on the basis of religion or philosophy, is necessary.

    AGREE

    Bartholet believes all students have the “right” to be exposed to worldviews and ideas beyond the confines of their homes and of their parent’s beliefs. Homeschooling, she believes, can be a breeding ground for extreme religious views, racism, and misogyny. Bartholet and moderator of the event Professor James Dwyer agree that homeschooling has gone under-regulated for too long, with many states not enforcing the requirements for home education. They also argue that with such limited supervision of the state, child abuse may increase and go undetected.

    DISAGREE

    Many view Bartholet’s value of a child’s “rights” as one-sided. Her desire to expose secular, progressive ideas to those with “religious, traditional beliefs” only goes one direction, failing to expose religious beliefs to “secular” children. Those in support of homeschooling view Bartholet’s proposal as a direct violation of parental rights, and for those who are religious, of their religious freedom. One journalist challenges their notion of educational lack, questioning, “Have any of these people actually talked to a homeschooler?” Clearly this Harvard prof has done little research:

    Dr. Lawrence Rudner. Professor at the ERIC Clearinghouse, of the University of Maryland, surveyed over 20,000 homeschooled students for this study.

    Opposers of Bartholet’s beliefs do agree with her that in cases where child-abuse and neglect are present, the state should intervene. They believe parents have the right to authority over their children, challenging Dwyer’s notion that “the reason the parent-child relationship exists is because the State confers legal parenthood.” 

    • Show Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    US Marshals Find 64 Missing Children

    FACTS U.S. Marshals from the Missing Child Unit have found 64 children in the ...

    Court Rules in Favor of Employer Religious Rights

    FACTS The Trump regulation allowing employers to opt-out of contraception coverage for employees due ...

    New Head of Tik Tok

    FACTS Recent social media giant TikTok has a new CEO, Kevin Mayer, who was ...

    Justice Amy Coney Barrett

    FACTS Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed Monday night as the 115th Supreme Court Justice ...

    Clemency

    Facts President Donald Trump extended clemency to a number of convicted persons; the big ...

    Russian Protests Draw Tens of Thousands

    FACTS Tens of thousands of people are protesting for the second successive week in ...

    GET LUCIDFIND TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK - ONCE A WEEK