David provides a proper orientation regarding the expansion of New York’s quarantine procedures, specifically Rule 2.13 allowing for forced quarantine without due process, several key points are highlighted. Firstly, he delves into the ethical and biblical precedent, noting that while quarantine practices have historical roots in public health for thousands of years, fairness and due process have always been integral. Secondly, David underscores the moral consequences, emphasizing that bypassing due process challenges justice and the delicate balance between public health and individual rights. Thirdly, he touches on the civil impact, pointing out that disregarding due process undermines democratic principles, potentially compromising citizens’ civil rights and eroding trust in the government. Ultimately, the discussion aims to shed light on such laws, urging viewers to stay informed and engaged with current policies affecting fundamental rights and freedoms.

  • Show Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

You May Also Like

Bolivia: A Rightful Coup?

Facts Bolivian President Evo Morales was ousted from office by the country’s military under ...

Affirmative Action

Affirmative action is a set of policies and practices designed to address historical and ...

NYPD, The New KKK?

“NYPD, KKK, IDF they’re all the same” Is this statement True? David provides a ...

Church and State, Should There Be A Separation?

Lucas at the TurningPoint AmFest event asking people should their be a separation between ...

NYC Protest Gets Violent!

View this post on Instagram A post shared by Lucid News (@readlucid) Pro-Palestinian protestors ...

President of Harvard, Selective Free Speech?

View this post on Instagram A post shared by Lucid News (@readlucid) It’s imperative ...